Please read the article regarding the confessions of Jonathan Gruber, one of the architects of the Affordable Care Act. I guess they're not really confessions, but rather boasts of how he and the administration successfully fooled the American people into supporting the ACA by hiding the negative impacts of the bill.
"Obamacare Architect Mouths Off Again"
I'm not shocked by what Gruber has said. For those who educated themselves on the issue it seemed rather obvious that the administration and the advocates of the ACA were not transparent with the American people, (Nancy Pelosi - "We'll have to pass the bill to find out what is in it".)
The reaction from some of those on the left who have advocated for the ACA is troubling and, to put it mildly, upsetting...but not unexpected. Here are a few snippets from Jay Carney, former White House Press Secretary:
"It's not good" - referring to what Gruber is saying.
Gruber "speaks from the ivory tower with remarkable hubris about the American voter and by extension the American Congress."
"To speak that way [is] very harmful politically to the president."
Mr. Carney, and others, I appreciate your concern for the president in this matter. I would rather focus, however, on the harm done to the American people. What about the impact of dishonesty and manipulation in order to get your way with the electorate? What about the negative impacts of the bill that you attempted to hide from the American people? Your accepted form of government is wrong, it's autocratic. Your concern shouldn't be for the president that headed up this whole fiasco, but for the American people and the Constitution which swore to uphold and protect.
This is why a free and independent media is essential to a free society. Isn't it ironic that a self-employed investor, and not a professional journalist, was the one to uncover these tidbits?
What lessons should the voters take away from this? First, if you weren't aware that the government was attempting to mislead you regarding the ACA, you need to pay more attention. It pays to get your news from multiple sources with different biases so you know what is happening. These facts about which Gruber is boasting were not hidden, they were just being reported by people with whom you likely disagreed. Listen to opposing viewpoints and different sources. Second, you get what you vote for. Many who supported the concept of the ACA as described by the Democrat Party are not so thrilled about the impacts of the actual implementation. Ignorance does not negate your responsibility. Third, if you helped put in the politicians who put in place harmful legislation, you must push for the political change necessary to fix the problem.
Finally, one post script question: Of all the ACA advocates, how many of them had these same types of discussions personally with Gruber?